
Bowling Green
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.8%Bowling Green
50.2%Weber State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL159.2
MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -101

Weber State
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBowling Green 80
Projected Total159.2
Projected ScoreWeber State 79
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index50.2
112.6Offensive Efficiency113.6
99.1Defensive Efficiency108.2
13.5Net Efficiency5.4
-4.7Strength of Schedule-3.4
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.8
72.2Tempo71.5
53.4%Effective FG%52.6%
15.9%Turnover Rate15.5%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %32.6%
38.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%
9.8Average Margin3.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–50.2), defensive efficiency (99.1–108.2), net efficiency (13.5–5.4), recent form (1.4–-1.8).
Weber State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (113.6–112.6), strength of schedule (-3.4–-4.7), ball security (15.5–15.9).