
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.5%Merrimack
63.5%Troy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTroy -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINETroy -174

Troy
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 69
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScoreTroy 75
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index54.1
106.4Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.2Defensive Efficiency103.9
3.2Net Efficiency8.7
0.7Strength of Schedule-2.2
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.0
64.4Tempo70.4
49.3%Effective FG%52.1%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
39.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%
2.1Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Troy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTroy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–53.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–106.4), net efficiency (8.7–3.2), shooting efficiency (52.1–49.3).
Merrimack COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.2–103.9), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.2), recent form (12.9–2.0).