Tennessee Tech

13-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.6%Tennessee Tech

96.4%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -21.9

PROJECTED TOTAL157.2

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -2678

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee Tech 68

Projected Total157.2

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 90

Team Comparison

Tennessee TechMetricVanderbilt

44MMH Power Index68.9

105.4Offensive Efficiency120.9

107.0Defensive Efficiency105.7

-1.6Net Efficiency15.2

-3.8Strength of Schedule7.4

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.6Tempo70.9

50.4%Effective FG%55.3%

19.1%Turnover Rate13.5%

32.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

37.2%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-1.2Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–44.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–105.4), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.0), net efficiency (15.2–-1.6).

Tennessee Tech COUNTERS WITHrecent form (4.4–2.7), offensive rebounding (32.0–30.8).

Final

Tennessee Tech

56—87

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 31 • 71.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Tennessee TechTEAM STATVanderbilt

20-64FG33-71

31.0%FG%46.0%

8-233PT11-31

35.0%3PT%35.0%

8-10FT10-12

80.0%FT%83.0%

35Rebounds48

12Offensive Rebounds15

11Assists16

15Turnovers9

5Steals8

5Blocks4

12Fouls11

Player Box Score

Tennessee Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rodney Johnson Jr.	F	23	5-9	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Jaylon Johnson	G	31	4-11	1-3	0-0	5	3	0	0	9
Kyle Layton	G	28	2-9	2-5	3-3	1	0	1	0	9
Daniel Egbuniwe	F	21	3-8	1-3	0-0	5	2	3	3	7
Ray Glasgow	SG	13	2-8	2-5	1-2	3	1	0	0	7
David Craig	Center	9	3-7	0-0	0-1	6	1	0	1	6
Grant Slatten	G	12	1-3	1-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	5
Matthew Sells	Guard	13	0-1	0-1	2-2	1	2	0	0	2
Mekhi Cameron	G	24	0-6	0-4	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Ola Ajiboye	F	15	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	1	0
Grant Strong	Guard	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Bogdan Zimonjic	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Edwards	G	24	8-15	4-8	3-4	5	1	1	0	23
AJ Hoggard	Guard	22	6-9	1-2	2-2	4	4	1	0	15
Chris Manon	Guard	18	4-7	0-2	3-3	4	0	1	2	11
Grant Huffman	Guard	23	4-7	0-2	0-0	3	3	1	0	8
Tyler Nickel	F	21	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
MJ Collins Jr.	G	20	2-9	1-3	1-1	2	0	0	0	6
Tyler Tanner	G	20	2-5	1-2	0-0	4	3	2	0	5
Jaylen Carey	F	14	2-6	1-3	0-0	4	0	0	2	5
Devin McGlockton	F	25	1-4	0-2	1-2	14	2	2	0	3
Jordan Williams	G	2	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
JaQualon Roberts	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Coleson Messer	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Graham Calton	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.3Possessions71.3

78.5Offensive Efficiency122.0

122.0Defensive Efficiency78.5

-43.5Net Efficiency43.5

37.5%Effective FG%54.2%

40.7%True Shooting %56.7%

20.9%Turnover Rate12.7%

15.6%Free Throw Rate16.9%

35.9%3-Point Rate43.7%

0.73Assist / Turnover1.78

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 71.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.