Rice

13-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.0%Rice

89.0%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -14.4

PROJECTED TOTAL146.3

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -809

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRice 66

Projected Total146.3

Projected ScoreHofstra 80

Team Comparison

RiceMetricHofstra

45.1MMH Power Index59.3

108.3Offensive Efficiency114.0

109.2Defensive Efficiency100.9

-0.9Net Efficiency13.1

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.9

-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.3Tempo66.2

49.7%Effective FG%52.2%

17.8%Turnover Rate16.1%

35.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate32.0%

-0.6Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–45.1), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–109.2), net efficiency (13.1–-0.9).

Rice COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.2–-2.9), offensive rebounding (35.7–35.0), free throw rate (34.7–32.0).

Final

Rice

63—68

Hofstra

Hofstra by 5 • 73.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATHofstra

21-62FG24-63

34.0%FG%38.0%

8-213PT5-27

38.0%3PT%19.0%

13-20FT15-25

65.0%FT%60.0%

42Rebounds46

10Offensive Rebounds11

9Assists7

12Turnovers10

5Steals6

1Blocks5

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trae Broadnax	G	37	6-14	1-3	3-3	5	2	1	0	16
Kellen Amos	Guard	35	5-11	1-3	2-4	6	5	2	0	13
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	30	3-8	2-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	8
Jacob Dar	G	22	2-7	2-5	2-2	6	1	0	0	8
Denver Anglin	G	26	1-7	1-4	2-3	2	1	1	0	5
Emory Lanier	Guard	12	1-3	1-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	5
Andrew Akuchie	F	17	2-3	0-1	0-1	4	0	0	0	4
Caden Powell	C	23	1-6	0-0	0-3	7	0	1	1	2
Trey Patterson	F	12	0-1	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	0	2
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	F	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Aaron Powell	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cruz Davis	G	42	7-14	0-3	8-9	8	3	3	0	22
KiJan Robinson	G	32	5-15	2-8	0-0	3	1	1	0	12
Michael Graham	Forward	33	3-5	0-0	1-6	15	0	0	1	7
Jaquan Sanders	G	28	3-11	1-8	0-0	1	1	0	0	7
TJ Gadsden	Guard	13	2-5	1-3	2-2	4	0	1	1	7
German Plotnikov	G	32	2-3	1-2	1-2	1	0	0	1	6
Khalil Farmer	G	11	0-2	0-2	3-4	2	0	0	1	3
Jean Aranguren	G	22	1-5	0-1	0-2	2	2	1	0	2
Silas Sunday	F	12	1-3	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

73.7Possessions73.7

85.5Offensive Efficiency92.3

92.3Defensive Efficiency85.5

-6.8Net Efficiency6.8

40.3%Effective FG%42.1%

44.1%True Shooting %45.4%

16.3%Turnover Rate13.5%

32.3%Free Throw Rate39.7%

33.9%3-Point Rate42.9%

0.75Assist / Turnover0.70

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 73.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.