Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.8%Florida A&M

94.2%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -19.1

PROJECTED TOTAL140.0

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -1624

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 60

Projected Total140.0

Projected ScoreClemson 80

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricClemson

39.4MMH Power Index59.9

98.7Offensive Efficiency112.6

105.6Defensive Efficiency101.4

-6.9Net Efficiency11.2

-3.2Strength of Schedule4.6

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

70.6Tempo63.6

49.2%Effective FG%53.0%

21.6%Turnover Rate14.0%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

38.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-4.8Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–39.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–98.7), defensive efficiency (101.4–105.6), net efficiency (11.2–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHrecent form (4.5–-4.7), offensive rebounding (30.5–27.0).

Final

Florida A&M

58—86

Clemson

Clemson by 28 • 66.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATClemson

23-55FG30-60

42.0%FG%50.0%

11-263PT9-25

42.0%3PT%36.0%

1-6FT17-20

17.0%FT%85.0%

27Rebounds41

7Offensive Rebounds13

11Assists15

16Turnovers9

7Steals9

1Blocks1

16Fouls9

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Milton Matthews III	G	30	5-13	4-10	0-0	1	1	2	0	14
Roderick Coffee III	F	31	5-12	3-6	0-0	5	6	1	0	13
Jordan Chatman	G	14	4-6	3-4	0-3	3	0	0	1	11
Shaqir O'Neal	F	22	4-6	1-2	1-1	1	0	1	0	10
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	26	2-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Kaleb Washington	F	29	1-8	0-3	0-2	6	2	0	0	2
Saiyd Burnside	Forward	20	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	2
Jamine Charles	Forward	18	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Trey Lewis	Guard	5	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jocobi Hendricks	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Sterling Young	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Hunter	Guard	32	5-11	2-6	4-4	1	0	3	0	16
Chauncey Wiggins	F	23	3-4	3-4	6-6	2	1	0	0	15
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	30	6-11	0-3	1-1	3	4	2	0	13
Viktor Lakhin	Center	23	4-8	1-1	3-4	5	3	2	1	12
Christian Reeves	C	7	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	28	2-7	0-3	1-2	15	1	2	0	5
Del Jones	G	10	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Dillon Hunter	G	21	1-5	0-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	4
Myles Foster	Forward	8	2-4	0-0	0-1	4	1	0	0	4
Jake Heidbreder	G	10	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Asa Thomas	G	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Andrew Latiff	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Matt Kelly	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.2Possessions66.2

87.6Offensive Efficiency129.9

129.9Defensive Efficiency87.6

-42.3Net Efficiency42.3

51.8%Effective FG%57.5%

50.1%True Shooting %61.9%

23.9%Turnover Rate13.7%

10.9%Free Throw Rate33.3%

47.3%3-Point Rate41.7%

0.69Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

Clemson won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 66.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.