
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.0%Colgate
79.0%Sam Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -10.0
PROJECTED TOTAL157.2
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -376

Sam Houston
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 74
Projected Total157.2
Projected ScoreSam Houston 84
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index56.1
111.7Offensive Efficiency115.5
109.0Defensive Efficiency105.5
2.7Net Efficiency10.0
-2.0Strength of Schedule-2.2
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
68.4Tempo71.2
54.5%Effective FG%53.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.6%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate34.8%
1.8Average Margin7.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–48.8), offensive efficiency (115.5–111.7), defensive efficiency (105.5–109.0), net efficiency (10.0–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-2.2), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.2), ball security (14.8–16.6).