Weber State logo

Weber State

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%Weber State
30.4%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWeber State -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL158.4
MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -229
Pepperdine logo

Pepperdine

9-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWeber State 82
Projected Total158.4
Projected ScorePepperdine 76

Team Comparison

50.2MMH Power Index38.2
113.6Offensive Efficiency103.2
108.2Defensive Efficiency113.6
5.4Net Efficiency-10.4
-3.4Strength of Schedule0.7
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
71.5Tempo70.0
52.6%Effective FG%48.7%
15.5%Turnover Rate18.3%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
38.3%Free Throw Rate34.0%
3.9Average Margin-7.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Weber State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–38.2), offensive efficiency (113.6–103.2), defensive efficiency (108.2–113.6), net efficiency (5.4–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-3.4).
Final
Weber State logo
Weber State
68—53
Pepperdine logo
Pepperdine
Weber State by 15 • 69.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Weber StateTEAM STATPepperdine
22-58FG17-52
38.0%FG%33.0%
7-243PT4-14
29.0%3PT%29.0%
17-19FT15-24
89.0%FT%63.0%
43Rebounds37
10Offensive Rebounds9
8Assists10
13Turnovers14
10Steals7
1Blocks5
21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Weber State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Miguel TomleyGuard357-126-78-822100028
Blaise ThreattGuard357-170-37-974200021
Dyson KoehlerForward323-110-80-09010006
Nigel BurrisF251-40-12-27010004
Viljami VartiainenG181-51-30-00020003
Vasilije VucinicCenter201-40-10-04100002
Alex TewCenter151-30-00-05020002
Trevor HennigG111-20-10-02111002
Saadiq MooreGuard50-00-00-02000000
Declan CutlerF40-00-00-00000000
Pepperdine
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boubacar CoulibalyForward336-100-05-9110120017
Stefan TodorovicForward345-121-42-241000013
Zion BetheaG264-93-61-520200012
Maurice OdumG311-80-42-24710004
Danilo DožicC170-40-04-43011004
Dovydas ButkaF171-10-01-25110003
Taj Au-DukeGuard150-20-00-02100000
David MagerG130-30-00-01001000
Jaxon OlveraG110-20-00-03010000
Alonso FaureForward30-10-00-00001000

Advanced Game Stats

69.2Possessions69.2
98.3Offensive Efficiency76.6
76.6Defensive Efficiency98.3
21.7Net Efficiency-21.7
44.0%Effective FG%36.5%
50.7%True Shooting %41.8%
18.6%Turnover Rate20.5%
32.8%Free Throw Rate46.2%
41.4%3-Point Rate26.9%
0.62Assist / Turnover0.71
Game Summary
Weber State won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 69.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.