
Weber State
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%Weber State
30.4%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWeber State -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL158.4
MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -229

Pepperdine
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWeber State 82
Projected Total158.4
Projected ScorePepperdine 76
Team Comparison
50.2MMH Power Index38.2
113.6Offensive Efficiency103.2
108.2Defensive Efficiency113.6
5.4Net Efficiency-10.4
-3.4Strength of Schedule0.7
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
71.5Tempo70.0
52.6%Effective FG%48.7%
15.5%Turnover Rate18.3%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
38.3%Free Throw Rate34.0%
3.9Average Margin-7.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Weber State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–38.2), offensive efficiency (113.6–103.2), defensive efficiency (108.2–113.6), net efficiency (5.4–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-3.4).