Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

52.9%Lipscomb

47.1%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -112

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 75

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 74

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricAlabama A&M

47.9MMH Power Index42.3

111.3Offensive Efficiency105.9

107.6Defensive Efficiency106.6

3.7Net Efficiency-0.7

-2.5Strength of Schedule-6.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

68.8Tempo68.0

54.8%Effective FG%49.7%

16.0%Turnover Rate16.8%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

26.5%Free Throw Rate45.7%

2.5Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (111.3–105.9), net efficiency (3.7–-0.7), strength of schedule (-2.5–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–107.6), recent form (3.3–-1.0), offensive rebounding (28.0–25.9).

Final

Lipscomb

82—44

Alabama A&M

Lipscomb by 38 • 73.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATAlabama A&M

28-61FG16-64

46.0%FG%25.0%

14-353PT5-21

40.0%3PT%24.0%

12-15FT7-11

80.0%FT%64.0%

51Rebounds34

13Offensive Rebounds13

21Assists11

19Turnovers16

13Steals13

6Blocks4

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Pruitt	Guard	28	6-12	4-8	3-4	6	2	2	0	19
Gyasi Powell	Guard	24	5-10	3-6	0-0	4	1	3	0	13
Joe Anderson	Guard	25	2-4	2-3	2-2	3	3	2	0	8
Jacob Ognacevic	F	22	2-6	2-4	2-2	5	3	1	0	8
Dylan Faulkner	F	15	3-7	0-0	2-4	6	1	0	4	8
Rylan Houck	Forward	10	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	6
Grant Asman	F	15	2-3	1-2	0-0	3	2	0	1	5
Miles White	G	11	2-6	1-5	0-0	5	0	1	0	5
Logan Suber	G	15	1-2	0-0	1-1	1	2	1	0	3
Charlie Williams	C	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	3	2	1	3
Zach Lamey	G	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Luke Carter	G	2	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Kellan Boylan	F	11	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	2	1	0	0
Ross Candelino	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Jack Ingold	Guard	3	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
EJay Greer	Guard	12	5-8	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Chad Moodie	F	23	4-10	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	1	8
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	24	2-5	2-3	1-2	3	3	1	0	7
AC Bryant	G	16	1-6	1-2	1-2	5	0	3	0	4
Bol Kuir	Forward	10	2-5	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Jaylen Colon	Guard	12	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	15	1-5	0-3	0-0	2	2	3	0	2
Angok Anyang	F	11	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Aaron Smith	Guard	9	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	1	2
Clance Crosby	F	8	0-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	1	1
Darius Ford	Guard	24	0-13	0-3	0-0	4	2	1	0	0
London Riley	Guard	16	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Saliou Seye	F	13	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	0
Eric Lee	Guard	7	0-1	0-0	0-1	0	2	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.2Possessions73.2

112.0Offensive Efficiency60.1

60.1Defensive Efficiency112.0

51.9Net Efficiency-51.9

57.4%Effective FG%28.9%

60.2%True Shooting %31.8%

25.6%Turnover Rate22.2%

24.6%Free Throw Rate17.2%

57.4%3-Point Rate32.8%

1.11Assist / Turnover0.69

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 38 points. The game played at approximately 73.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.