
Middle Tennessee
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.9%Middle Tennessee
73.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -272

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 73
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Team Comparison
52.5MMH Power Index56.9
109.6Offensive Efficiency110.5
105.7Defensive Efficiency102.9
3.9Net Efficiency7.6
0.4Strength of Schedule0.4
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
68.8Tempo71.7
52.2%Effective FG%48.8%
16.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
31.3%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
33.2%Free Throw Rate36.9%
2.7Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–52.5), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.7), net efficiency (7.6–3.9).
Middle Tennessee COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.2–2.9), shooting efficiency (52.2–48.8).