Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

72.1%Quinnipiac

27.9%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -4.7

PROJECTED TOTAL140.9

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -258

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 73

Projected Total140.9

Projected ScoreStonehill 68

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricStonehill

51MMH Power Index37.9

106.8Offensive Efficiency97.5

102.1Defensive Efficiency100.7

4.7Net Efficiency-3.2

-2.3Strength of Schedule-5.4

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

70.5Tempo68.1

48.9%Effective FG%48.0%

15.6%Turnover Rate19.1%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

34.1%Free Throw Rate29.2%

3.4Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.5), net efficiency (4.7–-3.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-5.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.1).

Final

Quinnipiac

74—88

Stonehill

Stonehill by 14 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATStonehill

27-62FG33-62

44.0%FG%53.0%

6-203PT13-24

30.0%3PT%54.0%

14-17FT9-12

82.0%FT%75.0%

33Rebounds34

13Offensive Rebounds11

5Assists21

9Turnovers10

8Steals6

6Blocks5

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Paul Otieno	F	36	7-9	0-1	3-4	10	2	0	2	17
Khaden Bennett	G	30	7-11	2-3	1-1	2	0	1	0	17
Doug Young	G	24	6-13	2-5	2-2	2	0	0	1	16
Jaden Zimmerman	G	25	4-9	1-5	2-2	0	0	2	0	11
Amarri Monroe	F	35	2-12	1-4	2-4	7	3	3	1	7
Grant Randall	F	17	1-4	0-1	0-0	4	0	1	1	2
Ryan Mabrey	G	10	0-1	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	0	2
Richie Springs	Forward	9	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Alexis Reyes	Forward	12	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	1	1	0
Akintola Akinniyi	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Quinn Guth	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Morgan	Guard	30	7-15	5-8	3-4	3	2	0	0	22
Louie Semona	F	26	6-9	3-4	3-4	1	2	1	0	18
Hermann Koffi	G	36	5-9	3-7	0-0	2	4	0	0	13
Chas Stinson	G	28	5-10	0-1	0-1	9	2	3	1	10
Todd Brogna	F	28	3-8	1-1	2-2	6	3	0	1	9
Christopher Melis	Forward	17	4-5	0-0	1-1	3	3	1	1	9
Ethan Meuser	F	16	2-5	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	2	4
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	17	1-1	1-1	0-0	4	4	1	0	3
Neal Marquardt	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kesean Shillingford	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

111.4Offensive Efficiency132.5

132.5Defensive Efficiency111.4

-21.1Net Efficiency21.1

48.4%Effective FG%63.7%

52.8%True Shooting %65.0%

13.6%Turnover Rate15.0%

27.4%Free Throw Rate19.4%

32.3%3-Point Rate38.7%

0.56Assist / Turnover2.10

Game Summary

Stonehill won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.