
Winthrop
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.8%Winthrop
50.2%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWinthrop -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL169.0
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -101

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWinthrop 85
Projected Total169.0
Projected ScoreQueens University 84
Team Comparison
56.2MMH Power Index51.7
115.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
104.3Defensive Efficiency117.0
11.3Net Efficiency1.4
-3.6Strength of Schedule0.1
2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
72.4Tempo71.4
51.2%Effective FG%56.6%
15.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
35.5%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
44.4%Free Throw Rate37.6%
8.2Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Winthrop HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWinthrop holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.2–51.7), defensive efficiency (104.3–117.0), net efficiency (11.3–1.4), recent form (2.8–1.5).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–115.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-3.6), shooting efficiency (56.6–51.2).