Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.9%Lipscomb

57.1%Chattanooga

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADChattanooga -2.4

PROJECTED TOTAL153.6

MODEL MONEYLINEChattanooga -133

Chattanooga

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 76

Projected Total153.6

Projected ScoreChattanooga 78

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricChattanooga

47.9MMH Power Index45.9

111.3Offensive Efficiency112.7

107.6Defensive Efficiency110.5

3.7Net Efficiency2.2

-2.5Strength of Schedule-4.4

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1

68.8Tempo68.1

54.8%Effective FG%55.1%

16.0%Turnover Rate14.1%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %23.5%

26.5%Free Throw Rate29.2%

2.5Average Margin1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–45.9), defensive efficiency (107.6–110.5), net efficiency (3.7–2.2), strength of schedule (-2.5–-4.4).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.7–111.3), recent form (-0.1–-1.0), shooting efficiency (55.1–54.8).

Final

Lipscomb

80—62

Chattanooga

Lipscomb by 18 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATChattanooga

33-57FG25-56

58.0%FG%45.0%

8-173PT6-19

47.0%3PT%32.0%

6-6FT6-9

100.0%FT%67.0%

33Rebounds21

5Offensive Rebounds3

15Assists13

13Turnovers9

6Steals7

3Blocks1

11Fouls7

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joe Anderson	Guard	33	7-12	2-5	0-0	7	2	1	0	16
Jacob Ognacevic	F	32	6-9	3-4	1-1	6	3	0	0	16
Gyasi Powell	Guard	33	6-14	2-6	1-1	4	1	2	0	15
Will Pruitt	Guard	33	7-12	1-1	0-0	6	2	1	0	15
Dylan Faulkner	F	19	5-5	0-0	4-4	4	1	1	2	14
Charlie Williams	C	13	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Grant Asman	F	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	3	0	1	2
Miles White	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Logan Suber	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Kellan Boylan	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	0

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bash Wieland	Guard	31	9-14	3-5	0-0	4	2	2	0	21
Trey Bonham	Guard	28	3-6	1-2	1-2	4	0	1	0	8
Collin Mulholland	F	13	3-5	0-1	2-3	0	0	0	0	8
Makai Richards	C	14	3-5	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	6
Honor Huff	G	34	2-8	0-4	0-0	2	5	1	0	4
Jack Kostel	Guard	21	1-4	0-1	2-2	4	2	1	0	4
Garrison Keeslar	Forward	27	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Frank Champion	Forward	18	1-5	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	3
Latif Diouf	F	9	1-3	0-0	1-2	1	1	0	1	3
Parker Robison	G	5	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

119.2Offensive Efficiency92.4

92.4Defensive Efficiency119.2

26.8Net Efficiency-26.8

64.9%Effective FG%50.0%

66.8%True Shooting %51.4%

19.2%Turnover Rate13.6%

10.5%Free Throw Rate16.1%

29.8%3-Point Rate33.9%

1.15Assist / Turnover1.44

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.