
UT Martin
22-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%UT Martin
56.3%Charleston Southern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston Southern -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL149.3
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston Southern -129

Charleston Southern
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 74
Projected Total149.3
Projected ScoreCharleston Southern 75
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index47.5
103.8Offensive Efficiency110.1
94.0Defensive Efficiency105.7
9.8Net Efficiency4.4
-4.8Strength of Schedule-3.5
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8
67.2Tempo75.8
49.5%Effective FG%55.3%
21.4%Turnover Rate18.4%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
37.5%Free Throw Rate30.8%
6.6Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Martin HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–47.5), defensive efficiency (94.0–105.7), net efficiency (9.8–4.4), recent form (-0.8–-2.8).
Charleston Southern COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.1–103.8), strength of schedule (-3.5–-4.8), shooting efficiency (55.3–49.5).