Coppin State

7-24

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.8%Coppin State

91.2%Wagner

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWagner -17.4

PROJECTED TOTAL145.2

MODEL MONEYLINEWagner -1036

Wagner

14-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCoppin State 64

Projected Total145.2

Projected ScoreWagner 81

Team Comparison

Coppin StateMetricWagner

26.5MMH Power Index42.9

94.0Offensive Efficiency105.5

115.4Defensive Efficiency106.1

-21.4Net Efficiency-0.6

-2.4Strength of Schedule-5.0

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3

69.7Tempo67.6

46.5%Effective FG%50.2%

22.1%Turnover Rate18.9%

31.1%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

39.0%Free Throw Rate31.6%

-14.9Average Margin-0.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wagner HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWagner holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.9–26.5), offensive efficiency (105.5–94.0), defensive efficiency (106.1–115.4), net efficiency (-0.6–-21.4).

Coppin State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.4–-5.0), free throw rate (39.0–31.6).

Final

Coppin State

52—65

Wagner

Wagner by 13 • 57.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Coppin StateTEAM STATWagner

15-40FG19-46

38.0%FG%41.0%

5-163PT7-19

31.0%3PT%37.0%

17-22FT20-26

77.0%FT%77.0%

23Rebounds35

7Offensive Rebounds13

8Assists10

13Turnovers12

6Steals8

1Blocks3

19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Coppin State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Julius Ellerbe III	Guard	22	2-4	1-2	6-8	3	2	0	0	11
Jonathan Dunn	F	20	4-6	0-0	2-2	4	0	0	0	10
Toby Nnadozie	G	33	2-6	2-4	0-0	5	0	2	0	6
Camaren Sparrow	G	29	1-6	0-1	4-4	1	0	3	0	6
Khali Horton	F	30	2-9	1-7	0-0	4	1	0	0	5
Peter Oduro	F	26	1-3	0-0	3-4	4	0	0	1	5
Cam'Ron Brown	G	24	1-3	1-1	2-3	1	3	1	0	5
Zahree Harrison	Guard	16	2-3	0-1	0-1	1	2	0	0	4

Wagner

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ja'Kair Sanchez	G	38	7-11	4-6	4-4	5	1	2	1	22
R.J. Greene	G	20	2-6	0-0	10-14	5	1	2	0	14
Javier Ezquerra	G	39	4-11	1-5	0-0	6	5	1	0	9
Tyje Kelton	F	35	2-7	2-6	0-0	4	0	0	1	6
Keyontae Lewis	F	22	2-3	0-1	1-2	3	1	3	1	5
Zavier Fitch	F	15	1-4	0-0	2-2	4	0	0	0	4
Zae Blake	G	14	0-1	0-1	3-4	5	1	0	0	3
Di'Andre Howell-South	G	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Churchill Bounds	F	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.0Possessions57.0

91.2Offensive Efficiency114.0

114.0Defensive Efficiency91.2

-22.8Net Efficiency22.8

43.8%Effective FG%48.9%

51.5%True Shooting %55.7%

23.0%Turnover Rate20.9%

55.0%Free Throw Rate56.5%

40.0%3-Point Rate41.3%

0.62Assist / Turnover0.83

Game Summary

Wagner won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 57.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.