
Cornell
15-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.5%Cornell
42.5%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCornell -0.8
PROJECTED TOTAL166.0
MODEL MONEYLINECornell -135

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCornell 83
Projected Total166.0
Projected ScoreColgate 83
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index48.8
121.5Offensive Efficiency111.7
114.6Defensive Efficiency109.0
6.9Net Efficiency2.7
-1.1Strength of Schedule-2.0
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
72.8Tempo68.4
60.1%Effective FG%54.5%
16.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
29.7%Free Throw Rate30.0%
5.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cornell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCornell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–48.8), offensive efficiency (121.5–111.7), net efficiency (6.9–2.7), strength of schedule (-1.1–-2.0).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.0–114.6), ball security (14.8–16.0), free throw rate (30.0–29.7).