
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
87.3%Quinnipiac
12.7%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL143.8
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -687

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78
Projected Total143.8
Projected ScoreRider 66
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index29.1
106.8Offensive Efficiency96.3
102.1Defensive Efficiency115.3
4.7Net Efficiency-19.0
-2.3Strength of Schedule-0.9
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
70.5Tempo65.9
48.9%Effective FG%43.4%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.1%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
34.1%Free Throw Rate31.5%
3.4Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–115.3), net efficiency (4.7–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-2.3).