Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.5%Merrimack
15.5%Canisius
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -9.2
PROJECTED TOTAL132.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -545
Canisius logo

Canisius

10-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 71
Projected Total132.3
Projected ScoreCanisius 62

Team Comparison

53.7MMH Power Index33.9
106.4Offensive Efficiency97.1
103.2Defensive Efficiency108.8
3.2Net Efficiency-11.7
0.7Strength of Schedule-1.8
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
64.4Tempo64.8
49.3%Effective FG%46.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.6%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
39.5%Free Throw Rate32.4%
2.1Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–97.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.8), net efficiency (3.2–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (29.1–24.7).
Final
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
60—52
Canisius logo
Canisius
Merrimack by 8 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATCanisius
16-54FG19-64
30.0%FG%30.0%
7-253PT6-31
28.0%3PT%19.0%
21-28FT8-8
75.0%FT%100.0%
36Rebounds44
8Offensive Rebounds13
9Assists12
5Turnovers13
5Steals3
7Blocks5
11Fouls17

Player Box Score

Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Adam ClarkG406-180-110-1054200022
Matt BechtGuard264-104-100-202000012
Devon SavageGuard333-103-102-260000011
Bryan EtumnuF372-70-23-47106007
Sean TrumperForward381-50-04-612120006
Tye DorsetG130-20-22-40001002
Malik EdmeadG130-20-00-01110000
Canisius
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tana KopaGuard385-163-112-271220015
Jasman SanghaForward244-80-16-6100030014
Paul McMillan IVGuard316-181-70-011000013
Cameron PalesseG342-81-40-011410005
Dylan GodfreyF182-71-50-02100005
Anthony BenardG380-30-20-06400000
Evan van der PlasF150-20-10-03100000
Gianni ThompsonForward20-20-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1
90.8Offensive Efficiency78.7
78.7Defensive Efficiency90.8
12.1Net Efficiency-12.1
36.1%Effective FG%34.4%
44.6%True Shooting %38.3%
7.8%Turnover Rate19.2%
51.9%Free Throw Rate12.5%
46.3%3-Point Rate48.4%
1.80Assist / Turnover0.92
Game Summary
Merrimack won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.