Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.4%Clemson
75.6%Miami
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -310
Miami logo

Miami

26-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 68
Projected Total145.0
Projected ScoreMiami 77

Team Comparison

59.9MMH Power Index65.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency117.8
101.4Defensive Efficiency103.0
11.2Net Efficiency14.8
4.6Strength of Schedule3.6
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.6
63.6Tempo69.2
53.0%Effective FG%55.5%
14.0%Turnover Rate16.2%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
38.1%Free Throw Rate37.9%
7.2Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (117.8–112.6), net efficiency (14.8–11.2), recent form (3.6–-4.7).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–103.0), strength of schedule (4.6–3.6), ball security (14.0–16.2).
Final
Clemson logo
Clemson
65—55
Miami logo
Miami
Clemson by 10 • 59.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATMiami
23-58FG23-56
40.0%FG%41.0%
9-273PT4-25
33.0%3PT%16.0%
10-12FT5-6
83.0%FT%83.0%
34Rebounds36
12Offensive Rebounds12
10Assists5
7Turnovers13
4Steals3
3Blocks2
12Fouls11

Player Box Score

Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chase HunterGuard367-191-73-422100018
Ian SchieffelinForward395-113-42-2132000015
Viktor LakhinCenter204-72-32-250020012
Jaeden ZackeryNot Available363-80-52-22420008
Chauncey WigginsF252-51-20-03101005
Dillon HunterG181-21-21-21110004
Jake HeidbrederG131-51-40-02000003
Christian ReevesC70-00-00-02000000
Del JonesG40-00-00-00000000
Myles FosterForward20-10-00-00000000
Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalil BetheaG164-62-32-210000012
Lynn KiddCenter325-70-00-080110010
AJ Staton-McCrayG203-71-32-27001009
Matthew ClevelandGuard204-81-30-03000009
Brandon JohnsonForward322-80-30-08000004
Jalen BlackmonGuard122-50-30-01000004
Divine UgochukwuG92-20-00-00010004
Paul DjobetG151-30-10-04210002
Austin SwartzG130-30-21-20000001
Nijel PackG310-70-70-02300000

Advanced Game Stats

59.3Possessions59.3
109.6Offensive Efficiency92.7
92.7Defensive Efficiency109.6
16.9Net Efficiency-16.9
47.4%Effective FG%44.6%
51.0%True Shooting %46.7%
11.9%Turnover Rate21.7%
20.7%Free Throw Rate10.7%
46.6%3-Point Rate44.6%
1.43Assist / Turnover0.38
Game Summary
Clemson won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 59.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.