
Princeton
9-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.9%Princeton
84.1%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -12.1
PROJECTED TOTAL144.3
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -529

Furman
22-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 66
Projected Total144.3
Projected ScoreFurman 78
Team Comparison
43.5MMH Power Index53.9
105.1Offensive Efficiency113.3
110.3Defensive Efficiency105.1
-5.2Net Efficiency8.2
1.7Strength of Schedule-1.8
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
65.2Tempo67.4
50.3%Effective FG%55.4%
16.9%Turnover Rate17.7%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
35.0%Free Throw Rate32.6%
-3.4Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Furman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–43.5), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.1–110.3), net efficiency (8.2–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-1.8), ball security (16.9–17.7), free throw rate (35.0–32.6).