Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
88.2%Queens University
11.8%VMI
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -10.7
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -747
VMI logo

VMI

5-26
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 86
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreVMI 75

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index29.1
118.4Offensive Efficiency105.1
117.0Defensive Efficiency117.4
1.4Net Efficiency-12.3
0.1Strength of Schedule-5.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-21.9
71.4Tempo66.2
56.6%Effective FG%48.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate14.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %26.4%
37.6%Free Throw Rate29.9%
0.9Average Margin-8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (118.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (117.0–117.4), net efficiency (1.4–-12.3).
VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–14.8).
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
81—78
VMI logo
VMI
Queens University by 3 • 67.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATVMI
32-53FG25-56
60.0%FG%45.0%
9-213PT11-30
43.0%3PT%37.0%
8-15FT17-20
53.0%FT%85.0%
38Rebounds21
12Offensive Rebounds6
18Assists9
21Turnovers7
4Steals16
2Blocks4
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Leo ColimerioForward316-80-03-575010015
Jaxon PollardF216-81-10-183000013
Yoav BermanG274-73-61-444000012
Malcolm WilsonForward195-50-00-030110010
Chris AshbyG383-83-80-04210009
Maban JabrielF123-41-10-01100007
Nasir MannG243-70-20-16110006
Asjon AndersonG191-50-24-41210006
DJ ShineGuard71-11-10-01000003
Bryce CashGuard20-00-00-00000000
VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Rickey Bradley Jr.G333-151-612-1432400019
TJ JohnsonF366-104-81-260300017
Augustinas KiudulasF155-73-52-220000015
Robert PetersF274-72-42-260310012
Tan YildizogluG304-81-20-01510009
AJ ClarkG233-30-00-00053006
Linus HolmstromG170-30-30-01100000
Walker AndrewsG90-10-10-01000000
Kaden StuckeyF60-10-00-00100000
Cal ListonF40-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8
119.5Offensive Efficiency115.0
115.0Defensive Efficiency119.5
4.4Net Efficiency-4.4
68.9%Effective FG%54.5%
67.4%True Shooting %59.5%
30.4%Turnover Rate10.5%
28.3%Free Throw Rate35.7%
39.6%3-Point Rate53.6%
0.86Assist / Turnover1.29
Game Summary
Queens University won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.