
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
88.2%Queens University
11.8%VMI
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -10.7
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -747

VMI
5-26MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 86
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreVMI 75
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index29.1
118.4Offensive Efficiency105.1
117.0Defensive Efficiency117.4
1.4Net Efficiency-12.3
0.1Strength of Schedule-5.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-21.9
71.4Tempo66.2
56.6%Effective FG%48.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate14.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %26.4%
37.6%Free Throw Rate29.9%
0.9Average Margin-8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (118.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (117.0–117.4), net efficiency (1.4–-12.3).
VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–14.8).