
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.0%Tulane
87.0%George Mason
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorge Mason -13.5
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorge Mason -669

George Mason
23-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 66
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScoreGeorge Mason 79
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index56.8
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.9
109.9Defensive Efficiency104.5
-4.6Net Efficiency8.4
2.7Strength of Schedule2.8
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.0
68.7Tempo64.9
49.6%Effective FG%53.4%
15.6%Turnover Rate16.3%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
44.8%Free Throw Rate43.6%
-3.2Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
George Mason HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorge Mason holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (112.9–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.5–109.9), net efficiency (8.4–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–16.3), free throw rate (44.8–43.6).