
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.4%UNLV
56.6%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -130

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 77
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreCreighton 80
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index50.6
111.0Offensive Efficiency109.0
109.6Defensive Efficiency109.5
1.4Net Efficiency-0.5
2.7Strength of Schedule5.1
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
71.4Tempo68.9
53.7%Effective FG%53.0%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.6%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
41.6%Free Throw Rate29.0%
1.0Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–50.6), offensive efficiency (111.0–109.0), net efficiency (1.4–-0.5), recent form (1.1–-5.2).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.5–109.6), strength of schedule (5.1–2.7), ball security (16.6–17.2).