Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.2%Grambling

53.8%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPepperdine -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL147.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPepperdine -116

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 73

Projected Total147.2

Projected ScorePepperdine 74

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricPepperdine

41.4MMH Power Index38.2

100.7Offensive Efficiency103.2

100.4Defensive Efficiency113.6

0.3Net Efficiency-10.4

-5.7Strength of Schedule0.7

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

69.9Tempo70.0

49.2%Effective FG%48.7%

20.9%Turnover Rate18.3%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

42.2%Free Throw Rate34.0%

0.2Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–38.2), defensive efficiency (100.4–113.6), net efficiency (0.3–-10.4), recent form (-0.4–-10.3).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.2–100.7), strength of schedule (0.7–-5.7), ball security (18.3–20.9).

Final

Grambling

57—85

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 28 • 69.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATPepperdine

21-55FG34-69

38.0%FG%49.0%

5-173PT10-23

29.0%3PT%43.0%

10-18FT7-9

56.0%FT%78.0%

33Rebounds42

8Offensive Rebounds11

10Assists18

14Turnovers8

5Steals6

4Blocks7

12Fouls14

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwan Burnett	G	37	5-11	1-4	4-6	1	2	0	0	15
Mikale Stevenson	G	33	4-10	0-2	6-8	5	3	1	0	14
Cbo Newton	G	18	4-4	3-3	0-0	1	1	2	0	11
James Flippin	F	22	2-5	0-1	0-2	3	3	0	0	4
Ernest Ross	Forward	19	2-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	4
P.J. Edwards	G	16	1-7	1-3	0-0	4	0	0	0	3
Kintavious Dozier	G	18	1-9	0-2	0-0	6	1	1	0	2
PJ Eason	F	17	1-3	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	1	2
Lou Hutchinson	G	12	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Solomon Ray	Forward	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	1	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Stefan Todorovic	Forward	27	7-15	5-9	3-3	7	1	1	1	22
Maurice Odum	G	32	7-13	2-4	0-0	4	9	1	0	16
Dovydas Butka	F	26	7-9	0-0	0-0	13	2	0	0	14
Jaxon Olvera	G	17	2-4	0-0	3-4	2	0	2	0	7
Alonso Faure	Forward	8	3-3	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	1	7
Boubacar Coulibaly	Forward	25	3-6	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	3	6
Taj Au-Duke	Guard	11	2-2	2-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Danilo Dožic	C	17	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	0	1	0	5
David Mager	G	6	1-5	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Zion Bethea	G	27	0-7	0-3	0-0	3	3	0	0	0
Alex Leiba	Center	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.9Possessions69.9

81.5Offensive Efficiency121.6

121.6Defensive Efficiency81.5

-40.1Net Efficiency40.1

42.7%Effective FG%56.5%

44.8%True Shooting %58.0%

20.1%Turnover Rate11.4%

32.7%Free Throw Rate13.0%

30.9%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.71Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 69.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.