Lamar

12-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.0%Lamar

86.0%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -11.8

PROJECTED TOTAL142.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -614

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLamar 65

Projected Total142.3

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77

Team Comparison

LamarMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

44.1MMH Power Index55.8

105.0Offensive Efficiency112.6

103.8Defensive Efficiency103.1

1.2Net Efficiency9.5

-3.0Strength of Schedule-1.9

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

66.6Tempo67.4

48.8%Effective FG%55.7%

18.0%Turnover Rate17.9%

35.5%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

28.5%Free Throw Rate29.6%

0.8Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–103.8), net efficiency (9.5–1.2).

Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.5–29.2).

Final

Lamar

84—52

UT Rio Grande Valley

Lamar by 32 • 67.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LamarTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

37-64FG18-54

58.0%FG%33.0%

6-133PT5-29

46.0%3PT%17.0%

4-7FT11-12

57.0%FT%92.0%

36Rebounds30

10Offensive Rebounds10

13Assists8

10Turnovers17

9Steals8

3Blocks1

11Fouls14

Player Box Score

Lamar

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Alexis Marmolejos	G	35	7-13	2-4	2-2	3	3	2	0	18
Ja'Sean Jackson	Guard	30	7-11	1-4	0-0	3	3	0	1	15
Andrew Holifield	F	26	4-7	2-4	2-3	7	3	1	1	12
Adam Hamilton	Center	17	6-8	0-0	0-1	4	0	1	0	12
Danquez Dawsey	Guard	15	4-8	1-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	9
Janko Bulajic	C	11	4-5	0-0	0-1	2	0	1	0	8
Terrance Dixon Jr.	F	10	3-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Cody Pennebaker	G	32	1-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	3	0	2
Errol White	F	22	1-4	0-0	0-0	6	3	0	1	2
Braden East	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
K.T. Raimey	Guard	27	2-10	0-6	6-6	2	0	0	0	10
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	29	4-8	0-3	0-0	8	2	1	0	8
Trey Miller	G	28	3-12	0-3	2-2	2	2	2	0	8
DK Thorn	Guard	15	2-6	1-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Marshal Destremau	F	10	2-5	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Cliff Davis	G	31	1-5	1-5	0-0	3	1	3	0	3
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	18	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Jaylen Washington	G	10	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	2	1	0	3
RJ Nance	Guard	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Kwo Agwa	F	8	0-1	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	1	2
Mustafo Vanjov	C	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Fadi Mougharbel	Guard	6	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Justin Mitchell	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.0Possessions67.0

125.4Offensive Efficiency77.6

77.6Defensive Efficiency125.4

47.8Net Efficiency-47.8

62.5%Effective FG%38.0%

62.4%True Shooting %43.6%

14.9%Turnover Rate25.5%

10.9%Free Throw Rate22.2%

20.3%3-Point Rate53.7%

1.30Assist / Turnover0.47

Game Summary

Lamar won by 32 points. The game played at approximately 67.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.