Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.3%Binghamton

84.7%Le Moyne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLe Moyne -11.9

PROJECTED TOTAL142.0

MODEL MONEYLINELe Moyne -554

Le Moyne

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 65

Projected Total142.0

Projected ScoreLe Moyne 77

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricLe Moyne

32.4MMH Power Index43.2

102.2Offensive Efficiency105.1

112.3Defensive Efficiency105.4

-10.1Net Efficiency-0.3

-6.0Strength of Schedule-3.8

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1

64.2Tempo69.4

51.3%Effective FG%53.5%

18.5%Turnover Rate18.9%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %24.8%

42.8%Free Throw Rate39.6%

-6.5Average Margin-0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Le Moyne HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLe Moyne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.2–32.4), offensive efficiency (105.1–102.2), defensive efficiency (105.4–112.3), net efficiency (-0.3–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHball security (18.5–18.9), free throw rate (42.8–39.6).

Final

Binghamton

72—62

Le Moyne

Binghamton by 10 • 63.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATLe Moyne

24-53FG24-60

45.0%FG%40.0%

11-223PT3-19

50.0%3PT%16.0%

13-17FT11-15

76.0%FT%73.0%

41Rebounds30

12Offensive Rebounds9

14Assists11

14Turnovers6

3Steals8

2Blocks5

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chris Walker	G	40	10-14	6-8	4-5	2	0	0	0	30
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	29	4-11	2-5	2-2	6	0	0	0	12
Gavin Walsh	F	37	4-10	0-2	2-4	10	1	2	0	10
Ben Callahan-Gold	Forward	20	3-6	3-6	0-0	3	1	0	0	9
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	25	2-5	0-0	3-4	8	2	0	0	7
Tymu Chenery	Guard	40	1-6	0-1	2-2	5	8	1	2	4
Jayden Lemond	G	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Le Moyne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ocypher Owens	F	35	6-10	0-3	0-0	9	2	0	0	12
Robby Carmody	Guard	30	5-13	1-5	0-0	2	2	0	0	11
Zek Tekin	Guard	29	3-12	0-4	5-6	2	5	4	0	11
Darrick Jones Jr.	Guard	20	2-6	2-3	3-3	2	0	0	1	9
Dwayne Koroma	F	35	3-4	0-0	0-2	10	2	1	2	6
Will Amica	Guard	26	2-9	0-2	2-2	2	0	2	1	6
Nate Fouts	F	14	3-5	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	1	6
AJ Dancler	G	11	0-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

63.6Possessions63.6

113.2Offensive Efficiency97.5

97.5Defensive Efficiency113.2

15.7Net Efficiency-15.7

55.7%Effective FG%42.5%

58.9%True Shooting %46.2%

22.2%Turnover Rate9.4%

32.1%Free Throw Rate25.0%

41.5%3-Point Rate31.7%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.83

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.