Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

62.6%Vanderbilt

37.4%TCU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -2.6

PROJECTED TOTAL158.3

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -167

TCU

23-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 80

Projected Total158.3

Projected ScoreTCU 78

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricTCU

68.9MMH Power Index59.7

120.9Offensive Efficiency110.2

105.7Defensive Efficiency102.7

15.2Net Efficiency7.5

7.4Strength of Schedule4.6

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

70.9Tempo70.2

55.3%Effective FG%50.5%

13.5%Turnover Rate15.3%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %33.6%

39.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%

10.8Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–59.7), offensive efficiency (120.9–110.2), net efficiency (15.2–7.5), strength of schedule (7.4–4.6).

TCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–105.7), offensive rebounding (33.6–30.8).

Final

Vanderbilt

83—74

TCU

Vanderbilt by 9 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATTCU

25-59FG25-51

42.0%FG%49.0%

6-223PT10-17

27.0%3PT%59.0%

27-33FT14-26

82.0%FT%54.0%

37Rebounds29

13Offensive Rebounds7

12Assists19

12Turnovers18

12Steals7

2Blocks6

20Fouls24

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Edwards	G	28	8-16	1-4	13-14	4	1	2	0	30
Devin McGlockton	F	28	4-8	1-3	1-2	7	0	0	2	10
Tyler Tanner	G	27	3-6	0-2	3-3	4	3	5	0	9
Tyler Nickel	F	19	3-6	3-6	0-0	2	0	2	0	9
Grant Huffman	Guard	27	2-6	0-2	4-6	4	5	0	0	8
MJ Collins Jr.	G	24	2-6	1-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	7
Jaylen Carey	F	18	2-7	0-1	2-2	3	0	1	0	6
AJ Hoggard	Guard	17	1-4	0-1	2-4	1	1	1	0	4
Chris Manon	Guard	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
JaQualon Roberts	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

TCU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brendan Wenzel	Guard	28	3-3	3-3	2-4	1	2	0	1	11
Trazarien White	Forward	26	3-8	2-2	3-4	4	1	3	0	11
David Punch	F	23	5-8	1-2	0-0	7	1	0	2	11
Ernest Udeh Jr.	C	21	4-5	0-0	3-6	5	1	2	1	11
Noah Reynolds	Guard	25	3-7	1-3	2-2	5	2	0	0	9
Vasean Allette	PG	22	3-7	1-3	2-5	2	4	0	1	9
Frankie Collins	G	35	2-9	0-1	2-5	3	7	2	0	6
Micah Robinson	F	11	2-2	2-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Malick Diallo	C	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	0
Isaiah Manning	F	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1

112.0Offensive Efficiency99.9

99.9Defensive Efficiency112.0

12.1Net Efficiency-12.1

47.5%Effective FG%58.8%

55.6%True Shooting %58.4%

16.3%Turnover Rate24.2%

55.9%Free Throw Rate51.0%

37.3%3-Point Rate33.3%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.06

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.