Harvard

17-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

82.7%Harvard

17.3%New Hampshire

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -8.7

PROJECTED TOTAL139.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -478

New Hampshire

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHarvard 74

Projected Total139.9

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 66

Team Comparison

HarvardMetricNew Hampshire

52.6MMH Power Index34

108.1Offensive Efficiency99.6

102.9Defensive Efficiency107.5

5.2Net Efficiency-7.9

-0.1Strength of Schedule-3.4

8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

64.8Tempo69.4

53.4%Effective FG%47.6%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.1%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

27.9%Free Throw Rate29.4%

3.4Average Margin-5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–34.0), offensive efficiency (108.1–99.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.5), net efficiency (5.2–-7.9).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHball security (16.1–17.2), offensive rebounding (26.7–26.3), free throw rate (29.4–27.9).

Final

Harvard

72—62

New Hampshire

Harvard by 10 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATNew Hampshire

22-44FG22-55

50.0%FG%40.0%

4-143PT5-23

29.0%3PT%22.0%

24-28FT13-14

86.0%FT%93.0%

30Rebounds30

6Offensive Rebounds10

12Assists10

19Turnovers16

12Steals10

1Blocks2

15Fouls19

Player Box Score

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	32	5-11	0-1	5-7	3	2	2	0	15
Chandler Pigge	G	37	6-9	1-1	1-2	9	5	4	0	14
Louis Lesmond	G	23	4-7	2-5	3-4	1	1	0	0	13
Evan Nelson	G	28	2-3	0-0	6-6	3	2	4	0	10
Tey Barbour	G	24	1-4	0-3	5-5	2	0	0	0	7
Thomas Batties III	F	31	1-6	0-2	4-4	4	1	0	1	6
Xavier Nesbitt	G	10	2-2	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	5
Dutch Dowdell	G	6	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Ben Eisendrath	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Anthony McComb III	G	35	8-15	0-4	5-6	3	0	1	0	21
Sami Pissis	G	29	5-16	2-10	4-4	3	3	2	0	16
Caleb Middleton	C	23	4-4	0-0	2-2	11	1	1	0	10
Davide Poser	F	33	3-7	2-4	0-0	0	3	2	0	8
Khalil Badru	G	24	1-6	1-2	2-2	5	2	1	0	5
Jawarie Hamelin	Guard	26	1-5	0-3	0-0	1	1	2	2	2
Dylan Saunders	F	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Emmanuel Okpomo	Forward	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Jon O'Neill	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

104.3Offensive Efficiency89.9

89.9Defensive Efficiency104.3

14.5Net Efficiency-14.5

54.5%Effective FG%44.5%

62.8%True Shooting %50.3%

27.0%Turnover Rate23.7%

63.6%Free Throw Rate25.5%

31.8%3-Point Rate41.8%

0.63Assist / Turnover0.63

Game Summary

Harvard won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.