
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.2%Colgate
40.8%Northeastern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL156.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -145

Northeastern
8-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 79
Projected Total156.2
Projected ScoreNortheastern 77
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index40.9
111.7Offensive Efficiency107.1
109.0Defensive Efficiency115.7
2.7Net Efficiency-8.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule2.7
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.0
68.4Tempo69.9
54.5%Effective FG%52.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.4%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
30.0%Free Throw Rate29.9%
1.8Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–40.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–107.1), defensive efficiency (109.0–115.7), net efficiency (2.7–-8.6).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.0), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.9).