Louisiana Tech logo

Louisiana Tech

20-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Louisiana Tech
31.1%Louisiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisiana Tech -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL132.9
MODEL MONEYLINELouisiana Tech -222
Louisiana logo

Louisiana

11-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisiana Tech 69
Projected Total132.9
Projected ScoreLouisiana 64

Team Comparison

50.3MMH Power Index38.6
106.1Offensive Efficiency99.3
98.7Defensive Efficiency110.2
7.4Net Efficiency-10.9
-5.1Strength of Schedule1.5
5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.0
65.9Tempo64.1
49.4%Effective FG%47.1%
18.5%Turnover Rate16.8%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
33.5%Free Throw Rate29.5%
4.9Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Louisiana Tech HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisiana Tech holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–38.6), offensive efficiency (106.1–99.3), defensive efficiency (98.7–110.2), net efficiency (7.4–-10.9).
Louisiana COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.5–-5.1), ball security (16.8–18.5).
Final
Louisiana Tech logo
Louisiana Tech
69—69
Louisiana logo
Louisiana
Tied • 64.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Louisiana TechTEAM STATLouisiana
27-51FG27-51
53.0%FG%53.0%
5-133PT5-13
38.0%3PT%38.0%
10-14FT10-14
71.0%FT%71.0%
36Rebounds36
9Offensive Rebounds9
12Assists12
16Turnovers16
4Steals4
4Blocks4
15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Louisiana Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Daniel BatchoForward257-110-05-8110010019
Amaree AbramG335-92-30-122100012
Kaden CooperG374-91-42-282110011
Sean Newman Jr.G374-101-21-137100010
AJ BatesG172-31-22-23111007
Will AllenF153-30-00-06000006
Al GreenG302-60-20-02001004
Devin ReeF60-00-00-01000000
Louisiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Daniel BatchoForward257-110-05-8110010019
Amaree AbramG335-92-30-122100012
Kaden CooperG374-91-42-282110011
Sean Newman Jr.G374-101-21-137100010
AJ BatesG172-31-22-23111007
Will AllenF153-30-00-06000006
Al GreenG302-60-20-02001004
Devin ReeF60-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.7Possessions64.7
106.6Offensive Efficiency106.6
106.6Defensive Efficiency106.6
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
57.8%Effective FG%57.8%
59.8%True Shooting %59.8%
24.7%Turnover Rate24.7%
27.5%Free Throw Rate27.5%
25.5%3-Point Rate25.5%
0.75Assist / Turnover0.75
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 64.7 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.