Southern Miss

19-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

52.9%Southern Miss

47.1%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSouthern Miss -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINESouthern Miss -112

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouthern Miss 75

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

Southern MissMetricTulane

49.9MMH Power Index44.3

106.1Offensive Efficiency105.3

104.9Defensive Efficiency109.9

1.2Net Efficiency-4.6

-0.2Strength of Schedule2.7

3.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

70.4Tempo68.7

49.9%Effective FG%49.6%

18.4%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.3%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

43.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

0.9Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Southern Miss HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouthern Miss holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (106.1–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.9–109.9), net efficiency (1.2–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.2), ball security (15.6–18.4), free throw rate (44.8–43.9).

Final

Southern Miss

58—86

Tulane

Tulane by 28 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Southern MissTEAM STATTulane

19-52FG30-61

37.0%FG%49.0%

8-263PT8-22

31.0%3PT%36.0%

12-18FT18-21

67.0%FT%86.0%

36Rebounds31

11Offensive Rebounds8

15Assists19

21Turnovers7

6Steals13

4Blocks5

19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Southern Miss

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Denijay Harris	Forward	31	1-5	0-0	10-12	9	1	0	1	12
DeAntoni Gordon	Forward	28	5-10	0-1	0-2	2	2	1	0	10
Christian Watson	G	26	2-6	1-3	2-2	7	3	0	1	7
Cobie Montgomery	Guard	23	2-6	2-6	0-0	2	1	1	1	6
Alfred Worrell Jr.	G	13	2-6	2-4	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Jose Benitez	Guard	20	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	3	2	0	5
Christian Reid	Guard	13	2-2	0-0	0-2	2	0	0	0	4
Brewer Carruth	G	15	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	2	1	0	3
Jett Montgomery	G	10	1-6	1-6	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Lieb Yat	Center	2	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Jeffery Armstrong	Guard	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Neftali Alvarez	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	0
Trey Alfonso	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kaleb Banks	F	31	7-11	1-2	3-3	5	0	0	0	18
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	33	6-10	2-4	2-3	1	6	3	0	16
Gregg Glenn III	F	27	6-10	1-1	3-3	10	3	2	0	16
Mari Jordan	G	28	2-8	1-4	5-6	7	4	2	1	10
Kam Williams	G	31	3-7	2-5	0-0	1	2	2	0	8
Asher Woods	G	18	3-9	0-4	0-0	0	3	2	0	6
Logan Stephens	G	3	0-0	0-0	4-4	1	1	1	0	4
Jake Shapiro	G	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Percy Daniels	C	11	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	3	2
Tyler Ringgold	F	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
KJ Greene	G	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Spencer Elliott	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Michael Eley	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joseph Teich	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3

82.5Offensive Efficiency122.3

122.3Defensive Efficiency82.5

-39.8Net Efficiency39.8

44.2%Effective FG%55.7%

47.9%True Shooting %60.6%

29.8%Turnover Rate10.0%

34.6%Free Throw Rate34.4%

50.0%3-Point Rate36.1%

0.71Assist / Turnover2.71

Game Summary

Tulane won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.