
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.6%UTEP
95.4%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -21.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.0
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -2074

Louisville
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 65
Projected Total151.0
Projected ScoreLouisville 86
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index67.1
102.6Offensive Efficiency118.6
107.1Defensive Efficiency102.2
-4.5Net Efficiency16.4
1.7Strength of Schedule6.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
67.6Tempo71.0
49.2%Effective FG%56.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.8%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
35.6%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-3.1Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (118.6–102.6), defensive efficiency (102.2–107.1), net efficiency (16.4–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (35.6–34.1).