
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.6%Tulsa
41.4%UCF
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL163.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -142

UCF
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 83
Projected Total163.0
Projected ScoreUCF 80
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index57.1
121.1Offensive Efficiency113.3
104.8Defensive Efficiency110.0
16.3Net Efficiency3.3
0.0Strength of Schedule6.6
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8
70.2Tempo71.2
55.4%Effective FG%53.0%
15.4%Turnover Rate16.0%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
42.4%Free Throw Rate31.1%
11.5Average Margin2.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–57.1), offensive efficiency (121.1–113.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–110.0), net efficiency (16.3–3.3).
UCF COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.6–0.0), offensive rebounding (34.3–33.8).