
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
90.8%Queens University
9.2%Gardner-Webb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -14.6
PROJECTED TOTAL165.5
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -987

Gardner-Webb
4-29MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 90
Projected Total165.5
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 75
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index26.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency96.0
117.0Defensive Efficiency120.4
1.4Net Efficiency-24.4
0.1Strength of Schedule3.3
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-18.2
71.4Tempo71.0
56.6%Effective FG%48.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.2%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %23.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate31.5%
0.9Average Margin-17.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–26.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–96.0), defensive efficiency (117.0–120.4), net efficiency (1.4–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–0.1).