Fordham logo

Fordham

17-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
78.5%Fordham
21.5%Bryant
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL135.0
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -365
Bryant logo

Bryant

9-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 72
Projected Total135.0
Projected ScoreBryant 63

Team Comparison

50.3MMH Power Index34.1
105.9Offensive Efficiency98.6
99.3Defensive Efficiency110.2
6.6Net Efficiency-11.6
-2.4Strength of Schedule-1.3
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
65.9Tempo65.8
50.0%Effective FG%48.0%
17.3%Turnover Rate20.0%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %28.1%
26.9%Free Throw Rate31.2%
4.4Average Margin-7.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Fordham HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–34.1), offensive efficiency (105.9–98.6), defensive efficiency (99.3–110.2), net efficiency (6.6–-11.6).
Bryant COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.3–-2.4), free throw rate (31.2–26.9).
Final
Fordham logo
Fordham
86—84
Bryant logo
Bryant
Fordham by 2 • 80.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

FordhamTEAM STATBryant
30-69FG27-61
43.0%FG%44.0%
7-233PT6-18
30.0%3PT%33.0%
19-22FT24-31
86.0%FT%77.0%
38Rebounds37
12Offensive Rebounds12
11Assists14
14Turnovers16
8Steals9
2Blocks3
22Fouls15

Player Box Score

Fordham
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jackie Johnson IIIGuard3410-224-115-622400029
Japhet MedorGuard365-120-37-804000017
Josh RiveraF308-141-20-051100017
Abdou TsimbilaForward143-50-04-440100010
Romad DeanF232-31-20-05100005
Matt ZonaForward231-31-22-24020005
Zach RileyGuard141-20-01-23100003
Jahmere TrippF230-80-30-04101000
Jaden SmithC30-00-00-02101000
Bryant
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kvonn CramerForward258-122-25-740110023
Earl TimberlakeGuard407-150-27-10108200021
Barry EvansF404-110-32-293200010
Jakai RobinsonG213-90-13-43210009
Kam FarrisGuard232-52-52-21011008
Connor WithersForward372-52-51-24121007
Keyshawn MitchellF141-40-04-43000006

Advanced Game Stats

80.6Possessions80.6
106.7Offensive Efficiency104.2
104.2Defensive Efficiency106.7
2.5Net Efficiency-2.5
48.6%Effective FG%49.2%
54.1%True Shooting %55.5%
17.2%Turnover Rate20.1%
31.9%Free Throw Rate50.8%
33.3%3-Point Rate29.5%
0.79Assist / Turnover0.88
Game Summary
Fordham won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 80.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.