
UL Monroe
4-28GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.0%UL Monroe
93.0%UT Arlington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -19.3
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -1329

UT Arlington
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUL Monroe 64
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 83
Team Comparison
30.9MMH Power Index49.6
101.1Offensive Efficiency102.7
117.1Defensive Efficiency97.9
-16.0Net Efficiency4.8
-1.0Strength of Schedule-0.8
-16.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9
71.7Tempo68.1
48.1%Effective FG%48.5%
16.9%Turnover Rate20.4%
25.3%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
40.6%Free Throw Rate43.7%
-11.5Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–30.9), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.1), defensive efficiency (97.9–117.1), net efficiency (4.8–-16.0).
UL Monroe COUNTERS WITHball security (16.9–20.4).