
Seton Hall
21-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
67.7%Seton Hall
32.3%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeton Hall -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL140.5
MODEL MONEYLINESeton Hall -210

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 73
Projected Total140.5
Projected ScoreRutgers 68
Team Comparison
57.1MMH Power Index45.9
105.8Offensive Efficiency104.2
98.3Defensive Efficiency112.2
7.5Net Efficiency-8.0
3.5Strength of Schedule3.9
0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
66.5Tempo67.4
47.9%Effective FG%47.4%
16.7%Turnover Rate15.0%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
35.7%Free Throw Rate36.3%
5.0Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Seton Hall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSeton Hall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–45.9), offensive efficiency (105.8–104.2), defensive efficiency (98.3–112.2), net efficiency (7.5–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–3.5), ball security (15.0–16.7), free throw rate (36.3–35.7).