
LSU
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.3%LSU
80.7%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -418

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 78
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreSMU 88
Team Comparison
54.2MMH Power Index62.5
115.5Offensive Efficiency118.2
111.3Defensive Efficiency109.6
4.2Net Efficiency8.6
4.5Strength of Schedule7.0
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
70.5Tempo71.1
53.4%Effective FG%55.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.7%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
41.9%Free Throw Rate31.3%
2.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–54.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–115.5), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.3), net efficiency (8.6–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (41.9–31.3).