LSU logo

LSU

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.3%LSU
80.7%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -418
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 78
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreSMU 88

Team Comparison

LSUMetricSMU
54.2MMH Power Index62.5
115.5Offensive Efficiency118.2
111.3Defensive Efficiency109.6
4.2Net Efficiency8.6
4.5Strength of Schedule7.0
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
70.5Tempo71.1
53.4%Effective FG%55.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.7%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
41.9%Free Throw Rate31.3%
2.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–54.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–115.5), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.3), net efficiency (8.6–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (41.9–31.3).
Final
LSU logo
LSU
64—74
SMU logo
SMU
SMU by 10 • 72.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATSMU
23-54FG27-60
43.0%FG%45.0%
4-153PT6-16
27.0%3PT%38.0%
14-18FT14-23
78.0%FT%61.0%
31Rebounds41
7Offensive Rebounds13
14Assists20
17Turnovers15
10Steals9
4Blocks4
18Fouls14

Player Box Score

LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan SearsGuard347-131-46-734400021
Dji BaileyGuard394-72-33-442100013
Cam CarterGuard363-111-34-426300011
Daimion CollinsF304-80-31-35002009
Corey ChestF313-80-00-011121006
Vyctorius MillerG141-40-20-01100002
Robert Miller IIIF101-20-00-01001002
Curtis Givens IIIG60-10-00-00000000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Matt CrossForward356-121-23-6162110016
Samet YigitogluC304-80-04-642120012
B.J. EdwardsG293-41-15-686300012
Chuck HarrisGuard224-83-40-011000011
Boopie MillerG283-111-42-20711009
Kario OquendoGuard252-90-30-03100004
Yohan TraoreF162-50-20-22120004
Keon Ambrose-HyltonForward82-20-00-02000004
Jerrell ColbertF71-10-00-11010002

Advanced Game Stats

72.8Possessions72.8
87.9Offensive Efficiency101.6
101.6Defensive Efficiency87.9
-13.7Net Efficiency13.7
46.3%Effective FG%50.0%
51.2%True Shooting %52.2%
23.4%Turnover Rate20.6%
33.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%
27.8%3-Point Rate26.7%
0.82Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
SMU won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 72.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.