
Radford
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.4%Radford
51.6%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah -107

Utah
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRadford 80
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreUtah 80
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index43.9
110.9Offensive Efficiency108.8
107.4Defensive Efficiency115.8
3.5Net Efficiency-7.0
-4.6Strength of Schedule5.1
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
73.4Tempo68.3
52.6%Effective FG%52.3%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
41.0%Free Throw Rate32.2%
2.5Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Radford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRadford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–43.9), offensive efficiency (110.9–108.8), defensive efficiency (107.4–115.8), net efficiency (3.5–-7.0).
Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–-4.6), ball security (16.7–17.0).