
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.1%Temple
80.9%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -424

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 67
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index59.3
112.2Offensive Efficiency114.0
107.4Defensive Efficiency100.9
4.8Net Efficiency13.1
-2.0Strength of Schedule-2.9
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
65.9Tempo66.2
51.1%Effective FG%52.2%
13.7%Turnover Rate16.1%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.3%Free Throw Rate32.0%
3.2Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–50.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–107.4), net efficiency (13.1–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-2.9), ball security (13.7–16.1), free throw rate (42.3–32.0).