Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.7%Alabama A&M

71.3%Chattanooga

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADChattanooga -6.6

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINEChattanooga -248

Chattanooga

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 72

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreChattanooga 78

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricChattanooga

42.3MMH Power Index45.9

105.9Offensive Efficiency112.7

106.6Defensive Efficiency110.5

-0.7Net Efficiency2.2

-6.8Strength of Schedule-4.4

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1

68.0Tempo68.1

49.7%Effective FG%55.1%

16.8%Turnover Rate14.1%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %23.5%

45.7%Free Throw Rate29.2%

-0.5Average Margin1.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Chattanooga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChattanooga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (112.7–105.9), net efficiency (2.2–-0.7), strength of schedule (-4.4–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–110.5), recent form (3.3–-0.1), offensive rebounding (28.0–23.5).

Final

Alabama A&M

63—85

Chattanooga

Chattanooga by 22 • 61.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATChattanooga

24-55FG25-49

44.0%FG%51.0%

11-213PT14-32

52.0%3PT%44.0%

4-13FT21-24

31.0%FT%88.0%

26Rebounds32

9Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists19

10Turnovers10

7Steals6

1Blocks1

21Fouls15

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AC Bryant	G	34	7-14	4-6	1-4	4	2	4	0	19
Darius Ford	Guard	26	4-10	3-4	0-0	3	3	1	0	11
Chad Moodie	F	32	3-8	0-0	3-5	4	0	0	1	9
London Riley	Guard	15	3-3	3-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	9
Jaylen Colon	Guard	15	2-6	1-4	0-0	1	1	1	0	5
Angok Anyang	F	16	2-3	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	12	2-4	0-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	4
Saliou Seye	F	18	1-3	0-0	0-2	2	2	1	0	2
Aaron Smith	Guard	15	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Clance Crosby	F	8	0-2	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	0	0
Warren Yeh	Guard	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ademola Oladipo	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Honor Huff	G	33	6-12	6-11	6-6	4	2	2	0	24
Trey Bonham	Guard	30	6-9	3-6	6-6	4	4	3	0	21
Frank Champion	Forward	18	2-2	0-0	4-4	2	3	0	0	8
Makai Richards	C	15	4-6	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	8
Sean Cusano	G	25	2-8	2-7	1-3	6	3	0	0	7
Jack Kostel	Guard	18	2-4	2-4	0-0	2	2	0	0	6
Bash Wieland	Guard	15	2-4	1-2	1-1	2	1	0	0	6
Garrison Keeslar	Forward	30	0-2	0-1	2-2	4	3	1	0	2
Latif Diouf	F	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Liam Vitters	G	1	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Noah Melson	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Collin Mulholland	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Parker Robison	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Houston Holland	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.8Possessions61.8

101.9Offensive Efficiency137.5

137.5Defensive Efficiency101.9

-35.6Net Efficiency35.6

53.6%Effective FG%65.3%

51.5%True Shooting %70.4%

16.1%Turnover Rate16.3%

23.6%Free Throw Rate49.0%

38.2%3-Point Rate65.3%

1.10Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Chattanooga won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 61.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.