Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%Stonehill

78.8%Boston College

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBoston College -8.2

PROJECTED TOTAL135.2

MODEL MONEYLINEBoston College -372

Boston College

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 64

Projected Total135.2

Projected ScoreBoston College 72

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricBoston College

37.9MMH Power Index45.1

97.5Offensive Efficiency100.0

100.7Defensive Efficiency104.8

-3.2Net Efficiency-4.8

-5.4Strength of Schedule4.8

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.3

68.1Tempo67.4

48.0%Effective FG%47.1%

19.1%Turnover Rate15.4%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

29.2%Free Throw Rate33.2%

-2.2Average Margin-3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (100.7–104.8), net efficiency (-3.2–-4.8), recent form (-3.4–-14.3), shooting efficiency (48.0–47.1).

Boston College COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (45.1–37.9), offensive efficiency (100.0–97.5), strength of schedule (4.8–-5.4).

Final

Stonehill

69—69

Boston College

Tied • 62.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATBoston College

24-53FG24-53

45.0%FG%45.0%

10-233PT10-23

43.0%3PT%43.0%

11-12FT11-12

92.0%FT%92.0%

26Rebounds26

8Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists12

12Turnovers12

7Steals7

5Blocks5

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Todd Brogna	F	36	10-16	3-4	2-2	4	4	2	0	25
Ethan Meuser	F	19	4-4	3-3	0-0	5	0	0	2	11
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	31	4-9	1-5	1-2	2	2	0	0	10
Chas Stinson	G	36	1-9	0-1	6-6	7	1	4	2	8
Hermann Koffi	G	32	2-5	2-5	0-0	3	3	0	0	6
Louie Semona	F	25	2-8	1-4	0-0	2	1	1	1	5
Alex Bates IV	Guard	11	1-2	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Neal Marquardt	Forward	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Boston College

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Todd Brogna	F	36	10-16	3-4	2-2	4	4	2	0	25
Ethan Meuser	F	19	4-4	3-3	0-0	5	0	0	2	11
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	31	4-9	1-5	1-2	2	2	0	0	10
Chas Stinson	G	36	1-9	0-1	6-6	7	1	4	2	8
Hermann Koffi	G	32	2-5	2-5	0-0	3	3	0	0	6
Louie Semona	F	25	2-8	1-4	0-0	2	1	1	1	5
Alex Bates IV	Guard	11	1-2	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Neal Marquardt	Forward	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.7Possessions62.7

110.0Offensive Efficiency110.0

110.0Defensive Efficiency110.0

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

54.7%Effective FG%54.7%

58.8%True Shooting %58.8%

19.1%Turnover Rate19.1%

22.6%Free Throw Rate22.6%

43.4%3-Point Rate43.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 62.7 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.