
Holy Cross
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.3%Holy Cross
87.7%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -13.9
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -713

Quinnipiac
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHoly Cross 66
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 80
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index51
103.3Offensive Efficiency106.8
110.9Defensive Efficiency102.1
-7.6Net Efficiency4.7
-2.6Strength of Schedule-2.3
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
66.1Tempo70.5
49.8%Effective FG%48.9%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
22.4%Offensive Rebound %34.1%
32.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-5.1Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–103.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–110.9), net efficiency (4.7–-7.6).
Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.8–48.9), ball security (15.4–15.6).