
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.6%Merrimack
75.4%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -7.5
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -307

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 67
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreStanford 75
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index59.2
106.4Offensive Efficiency111.6
103.2Defensive Efficiency107.1
3.2Net Efficiency4.5
0.7Strength of Schedule5.2
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
64.4Tempo68.1
49.3%Effective FG%51.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.5%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
39.5%Free Throw Rate37.2%
2.1Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stanford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–53.7), offensive efficiency (111.6–106.4), net efficiency (4.5–3.2), strength of schedule (5.2–0.7).
Merrimack COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.2–107.1), recent form (12.9–7.4), ball security (14.8–15.5).