
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.6%Longwood
72.4%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCampbell -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL157.3
MODEL MONEYLINECampbell -262

Campbell
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 76
Projected Total157.3
Projected ScoreCampbell 81
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index51.1
108.1Offensive Efficiency110.9
103.0Defensive Efficiency111.0
5.1Net Efficiency-0.1
-6.4Strength of Schedule0.8
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.9Tempo70.6
51.4%Effective FG%51.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate17.4%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.0%Free Throw Rate44.2%
3.6Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Campbell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCampbell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.1–47.0), offensive efficiency (110.9–108.1), strength of schedule (0.8–-6.4), recent form (2.9–2.3).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–111.0), net efficiency (5.1–-0.1), shooting efficiency (51.4–51.3).