
Mercer
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.0%Mercer
56.0%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL168.3
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -127

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMercer 84
Projected Total168.3
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Team Comparison
54.1MMH Power Index51.7
116.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
106.5Defensive Efficiency117.0
10.1Net Efficiency1.4
-4.4Strength of Schedule0.1
1.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
70.9Tempo71.4
53.8%Effective FG%56.6%
14.7%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
38.9%Free Throw Rate37.6%
7.2Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercer HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercer holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–51.7), defensive efficiency (106.5–117.0), net efficiency (10.1–1.4), ball security (14.7–14.8).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–116.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-4.4), recent form (1.5–1.2).