The Citadel

11-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.4%The Citadel

98.6%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -28.2

PROJECTED TOTAL157.3

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -7043

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreThe Citadel 65

Projected Total157.3

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 93

Team Comparison

The CitadelMetricVanderbilt

35.6MMH Power Index68.9

106.1Offensive Efficiency120.9

116.9Defensive Efficiency105.7

-10.8Net Efficiency15.2

-1.3Strength of Schedule7.4

-16.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

66.3Tempo70.9

50.4%Effective FG%55.3%

15.7%Turnover Rate13.5%

28.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

29.6%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-7.2Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–35.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–106.1), defensive efficiency (105.7–116.9), net efficiency (15.2–-10.8).

Final

The Citadel

53—105

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 52 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

The CitadelTEAM STATVanderbilt

19-46FG38-68

41.0%FG%56.0%

7-263PT12-23

27.0%3PT%52.0%

8-17FT17-21

47.0%FT%81.0%

27Rebounds38

9Offensive Rebounds15

9Assists19

20Turnovers3

1Steals15

5Blocks2

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

The Citadel

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Colby McAllister	Guard	22	5-7	2-4	3-3	1	0	0	0	15
Brody Fox	Guard	32	2-8	0-1	5-12	4	2	1	0	9
Sola Adebisi	F	25	4-6	0-2	0-0	6	0	0	2	8
Keynan Davis	G	19	3-7	1-5	0-0	0	0	0	1	7
Dante Kearse	F	16	2-7	2-6	0-0	4	1	0	0	6
Paxton Davidson	Guard	27	1-4	1-4	0-0	2	2	0	1	3
Cameron Glover	Guard	10	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Kam Roberts	Guard	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
John Adams	Forward	17	0-2	0-0	0-2	3	2	0	1	0
Christian Moore	F	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Dominic Commisso	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Eze Wali	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Devin McGlockton	F	23	9-13	1-2	0-1	8	1	0	0	19
Jason Edwards	G	22	5-10	3-4	6-6	4	3	1	0	19
AJ Hoggard	Guard	22	4-8	2-2	3-4	3	8	3	0	13
Jaylen Carey	F	17	5-8	0-2	2-2	7	0	0	1	12
Tyler Nickel	F	22	4-8	3-6	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Tyler Tanner	G	20	3-6	1-3	0-0	1	3	2	0	7
Miles Keeffe	G	3	1-1	1-1	4-4	2	0	0	0	7
Chris Manon	Guard	19	3-5	0-1	0-0	5	1	5	1	6
MJ Collins Jr.	G	15	2-3	1-1	1-2	1	0	2	0	6
Grant Huffman	Guard	18	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	2
Jordan Williams	G	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
JaQualon Roberts	F	7	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	1	0	1
Coleson Messer	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Graham Calton	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Hollman Smith	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

80.8Offensive Efficiency160.1

160.1Defensive Efficiency80.8

-79.3Net Efficiency79.3

48.9%Effective FG%64.7%

49.0%True Shooting %67.3%

30.7%Turnover Rate4.5%

37.0%Free Throw Rate30.9%

56.5%3-Point Rate33.8%

0.45Assist / Turnover6.33

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 52 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.