Evansville

7-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.5%Evansville

92.5%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -17.7

PROJECTED TOTAL139.6

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -1233

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEvansville 61

Projected Total139.6

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 79

Team Comparison

EvansvilleMetricUT Arlington

31.6MMH Power Index49.6

98.5Offensive Efficiency102.7

112.4Defensive Efficiency97.9

-13.9Net Efficiency4.8

1.8Strength of Schedule-0.8

-23.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

68.0Tempo68.1

50.0%Effective FG%48.5%

18.9%Turnover Rate20.4%

22.2%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

30.8%Free Throw Rate43.7%

-9.5Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–31.6), offensive efficiency (102.7–98.5), defensive efficiency (97.9–112.4), net efficiency (4.8–-13.9).

Evansville COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-0.8), shooting efficiency (50.0–48.5), ball security (18.9–20.4).

Final

Evansville

54—80

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 26 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

EvansvilleTEAM STATUT Arlington

17-55FG21-54

31.0%FG%39.0%

4-243PT11-30

17.0%3PT%37.0%

16-23FT27-36

70.0%FT%75.0%

26Rebounds56

10Offensive Rebounds22

10Assists12

11Turnovers16

8Steals6

1Blocks2

24Fouls19

Player Box Score

Evansville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tayshawn Comer	G	40	6-15	2-6	6-8	1	4	1	0	20
Michael Day	Center	21	3-7	0-1	3-7	3	1	0	0	9
Tanner Cuff	G	29	1-3	0-0	5-6	10	3	0	0	7
Cam Haffner	G	24	3-8	1-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	7
Joshua Hughes	F	25	3-10	0-4	0-0	3	0	3	0	6
Trent Hundley	F	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Gui Tesch	Guard	22	0-2	0-1	2-2	2	1	4	0	2
Connor Turnbull	F	22	0-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	0
Kaia Berridge	G	12	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Braylon Jackson	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Diante Smith	Forward	27	5-8	4-7	4-4	8	1	0	2	18
Lance Ware	Forward	30	5-9	0-0	4-7	13	3	3	0	14
Jaden Wells	Guard	24	4-11	3-8	1-2	1	0	2	0	12
Kade Douglas	G	13	3-4	3-4	1-1	1	0	1	0	10
Troy Hupstead	F	10	0-0	0-0	7-8	6	0	0	0	7
Raysean Seamster	F	20	0-2	0-0	5-6	3	1	0	0	5
Darius Burford	Guard	15	2-5	1-3	0-2	0	1	0	0	5
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	16	1-4	0-3	2-2	2	2	0	0	4
Cameron Jackson	F	2	1-2	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	0	4
Jaxon Ellingsworth	F	20	0-3	0-1	1-2	8	0	0	0	1
Brody Robinson	G	19	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	4	0	0	0
Zachariah Mianab	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jarren Cook	Guard	2	0-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

81.8Offensive Efficiency121.2

121.2Defensive Efficiency81.8

-39.4Net Efficiency39.4

34.5%Effective FG%49.1%

41.0%True Shooting %56.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate24.6%

41.8%Free Throw Rate66.7%

43.6%3-Point Rate55.6%

0.91Assist / Turnover0.75

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.