
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.1%Rider
95.9%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -21.1
PROJECTED TOTAL145.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -2339

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 62
Projected Total145.6
Projected ScorePennsylvania 83
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index52.9
96.3Offensive Efficiency108.6
115.3Defensive Efficiency106.4
-19.0Net Efficiency2.2
-0.9Strength of Schedule1.9
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
65.9Tempo69.9
43.4%Effective FG%50.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
31.5%Free Throw Rate36.3%
-12.6Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (108.6–96.3), defensive efficiency (106.4–115.3), net efficiency (2.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–31.1).