
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.8%Florida A&M
96.2%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -21.9
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -2532

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 66
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreBYU 88
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index63.9
98.7Offensive Efficiency118.3
105.6Defensive Efficiency106.8
-6.9Net Efficiency11.5
-3.2Strength of Schedule6.5
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
70.6Tempo70.6
49.2%Effective FG%54.7%
21.6%Turnover Rate15.2%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
38.0%Free Throw Rate35.4%
-4.8Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–39.4), offensive efficiency (118.3–98.7), net efficiency (11.5–-6.9), strength of schedule (6.5–-3.2).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–106.8), recent form (4.5–-2.2), free throw rate (38.0–35.4).