
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
80.7%SMU
19.3%Boston College
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.7
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -418

Boston College
11-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 80
Projected Total151.7
Projected ScoreBoston College 72
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index45.1
118.2Offensive Efficiency100.0
109.6Defensive Efficiency104.8
8.6Net Efficiency-4.8
7.0Strength of Schedule4.8
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.3
71.1Tempo67.4
55.7%Effective FG%47.1%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %28.1%
31.3%Free Throw Rate33.2%
6.1Average Margin-3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–45.1), offensive efficiency (118.2–100.0), net efficiency (8.6–-4.8), strength of schedule (7.0–4.8).
Boston College COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–109.6), ball security (15.4–15.7), free throw rate (33.2–31.3).